Direkt zum Hauptbereich

Thoughts on S&C Training: 5/3/1 September 2012

Just finished another 5/3/1 cycle yesterday. Since I'll be fighting again soon, I decided not to include Squats and Deadlifts - I just tend to put on too much mass when doing these. Instead, my lifting sessions revolve around the olympic lifts: the snatch and the clean & jerk. Additionally, I do bench presses and weighted pull-ups. Hence, I cover all of the following functional movement patterns:
  •     Vertical Push:    Jerk
  •     Vertical Pull: Pull-Ups
  •     Horizontal Push: Bench Press
  •     Horizontal Pull: None, although some coaches classify the deadlift as such. Hence, it's safe to say that the clean serves this purpose just as well.
  •     Knee-centered Stand-Up: Overhead lunge following the jerk
  •     Hip-centered Stad-Up (aka hinge): Both the clean and the snatch
  •     Anti-Flex, Anti-Rotation, Anti-whatever: Putting a big weight overhead and keeping it there
Snatches and pull-ups make up workout A, while bench pressing and the c&j form workout B. During the workout, I'm alternating between the olympic lifts and the grinds. As a general rule, however, the o-lifts always come before the grinds. So, for example, I'd do the following:
  1.     Snatch, 75% 1RM, 5 Reps
  2.     Pull-Up, 75% 1RM, 5 Reps
  3.     Snatch, 85% 1RM, 3 Reps
  4.     Pull-Up, 85% 1RM, 3 Reps
  5.     Snatch, 95% 1RM, AMRAP
  6.     Pull-Up, 95% 1RM, AMRAP
In between sets, I'm taking as much time as I feel like. I used to be rather strict about timing in the past, but now I consider it a rather autoregulatory thing. Well, autoregulatory or not, I feel that the grinds did suffer from their placement after the extremely CNS-intense O-lifts. As a matter of fact, this feeling is well backed by my training log, which is presented below:


Snatch Clean&Jerk  Pull-Up Bench Press
Exercise 1 Snatch


Test Result 55 75 120 100
Exercise 2 Clean & Jerk


95,00% 52,25 71,25 114 95
Exercise 3 Pull-Up


90,00% 49,5 67,5 108 90
Exercise 4 Bench Press


85,00% 46,75 63,75 102 85







80,00% 44 60 96 80
Odd Sessions: Snatch Pull-Up
75,00% 41,25 56,25 90 75
Even Sessions: Clean & Jerk Bench Press
70,00% 38,5 52,5 84 70







65,00% 35,75 48,75 78 65




















Session 1 2 3 4 5 6
Date 30.08.12
03.09.12
06.09.12
08.09.12




EXR 1 Snatch C&J Snatch C&J Snatch C&J
Weight Reps Weight Reps Weight Reps Weight Reps Weight Reps Weight Reps
Set 1 35 5 50 5 37,5 3 52,5 3 40 5 55 5
Set 2 42,5 5 57,5 5 45 3 60 3 52,5 3 65 3
Set 3 47,5 5 65 3 50 4 67 5 52,5 5 70 5
EXR 2 Pull-Up Bench Press Pull-Up Bench Press Pull-Up Bench Press
Weight Reps Weight Reps Weight Reps Weight Reps Weight Reps Weight Reps
Set 1 80 5 65 5 84 3 70 3 90 5 75 5
Set 2 90 5 75 5 95 3 80 3 102,5 3 85 3
Set 3 102,5 5 85 5 107,5 3 90 3 115 x 95 1
















Snatch Pull-Up



Session 1 3 5 1 3 5



H1RM 55,17 54,55 59 115,32 113,83 118,29



Test Result 55 55 55 120 120 120



Estimated strength increase (%) 0,3090909091 -0,8181818182 7,2727272727 -3,9 -5,1416666667 -1,425






Clean & Jerk Bench Press



Session 2 4 6 2 4 6



H1RM 68,83 75,95 78,76 95,63 95,3 95



Test Result 75 75 75 100 100 100



Estimated strength increase (%) -8,2266666667 1,2666666667 5,0133333333 -4,37 -4,7 -5




H1RM stands for "hypothetical 1 RM" and refers to 1 RM estimations made with [this app]. So, to sum the above up:
  • Snatch +7,3% (55kg -> 59kg)
  • Clean & Jerk +5% (75kg -> 79kg)
  • Pull-Up -1,4% (120kg -> 118kg, including bodyweight)
  • Bench Press -5% (100kg -> 95%)
Since the O-lifts are imho more important than the grinds (especially for fighters), I call that an OK month. Not perfect, but by all means ok. There'll be no regeneration week for me - tuesday, I'll jump right into the next cycle. Although Wendler proposes adding 5kg to the big lifts at the beginning of each new cycle, I feel that this is too much for the O-lifts. Hence, I'll only increase them by 2.5kg each.

What are your thoughts on O-lifts for martial artists? Just feel free to post your point of view to the comments section below. Looking forward to reading them.

So long,

take care

Kommentare

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

Happy new year

I wish you all a happy new year. Photo by camera slayer, found on flickr.org For me, the year won't start particularily good, I guess. On january 7th, the doc will put my foot into plaster again. This time, it's 4 weeks. After that, we shall see further. Now on the one hand, this is significantly screwed up. Gone are my plans of doing a max strength program to begin the year. Also, as a professional trainer, not being mobile at the beginning of the year means a serious handicap to my marketing actions. Novembet through February are, after all, the best months for any sports school, finance-wise. Also, I need to make up for all the losses my second studio has produced over the last year anyways. Instead of recovering financially, I'll now have to pay an instructor to teach my classes. Great. Not to mention all my plans of offering more classes at my Dojo. They're most definately put on a halt at the moment. As you can see, from a business point of view, my situation is s...

Thoughts on S&C: Assess, don't guess - Athletics @ Shinergy[base] Vienna

  Disclaimer: This one's going to be a bit lengthy, so I tried to include as many videos as possible to keep things fresh.  Since December, 2014, I'm in charge of the athletics class we run at the Shinergy[base] here in Vienna. In a nutshell, the athletics class is pretty much a functional strength class for small groups. In contrast to other systems out there (which all have their benefits in their own sense), out athletics class follows a simple periodization and is preceded by an individual assessment of each athlete. Our assessment usually doesn't take as long as, say, a full [FMS] , but then again, we screen for the selection of exercises we're actually planning on employing in the current program. This means that, although it might be beneficial for general health or long-term improvement of a functional movement base, there is no pressing need to screen for overhead competency if the plan calls for a horizontal upper body push. We can ḱeep our initial screens...

PUT Opole Open 2015, Part I

So over the next couple days I'll post the videos of our fights at the Opole Open 2015. I have to say, the [PUT] people really did a good job on organising the event, and while international participation was a bit lower than usual, the level of competition was awesome. What I like most is the non-dogmatic approach these guys take. Most schools offer both Taekwondo and Kickboxing, some also do other styles such as MMA or even Krav Maga. As long as they adhere to the rules, everyone's welcome to fight. Contrast this with the rivalry and bad blood that dominates the martial arts world here in Austria. For example, I've once witnessed all participants of the [WKF] being barred from entrance to the [OEBFK] national championships due to inter-federation rivalry. Needless to say, the level of competition suffers from stuff like that. Now you could argue that the situation in Poland is different in that there's no competing federations from the same style involved. ...